Lippincott v. Shaw Carriage Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
In Equity. Exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
A particular statement of the numerous exceptions filed by the parties is not deemed necessary here. Omitting many details of evidence, I give so much of the master’s report as is thought to ■have an important bearing upon the questions to be decided. Except in some particulars which will be indicated, the facts of the case as stated by the master are well supported by the evidence. The report is as follows:
The bill was filed by Ezra Lippineott and others, merchants, in behalf of themselves and all other creditors who might come in and pay their share of the costs, etc., against the Shaw'…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Curran v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sutton Manuf'g Co. v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Stuart v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Gantenbein v. BowlesOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Doe v. Northwestern Coal & Transportation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1896
- W. P. Noble Mercantile Co. v. Mount Pleasant Equitable Co-operative InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.