Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1996No. A068390PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, Acting P. J.

This appeal involves a question of first impression: can a person cohabit with two different people at two different locations during the same period of time? The issue arises in a prosecution under Penal Code section 273.5, 1 inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant. We conclude that, for purposes of criminal liability under section 273.5, a person may cohabit simultaneously with two or more people at the same time. Thus, we affirm the judgment. 2

Factual and Procedural Background

On July 20, 1994, the Marin County District Attorney filed a 16-count information…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. MejiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Morales-Garcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. People v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. MonteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API