Legal Opinion

Blue v. Gleaner Clearing House

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. Docket No. 51Published

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, a produce dealer at Columbiaville, sued the defendant for the price of two car loads of potatoes. The defendant admits the receipt of the potatoes, but claims it purchased them from one Crossman. Plaintiff insists that Crossman was acting as agent of the defendant in .making the purchase. The trial court submitted the question of Crossman’s agency to the jury, who found for plaintiff. The assignments of error relate to the admission of certain evidence and the charge of the court.

We think there was abundant evidence to justify the submission of the agency question to the jury.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hunt v. Stromberg Motor Devices Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cleveland Co-operative Stove Co. v. MalleryMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Spears v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API