Legal Opinion

Munoz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1993No. 71225PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of capital murder pursuant to Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.-03(a)(2). 1 The jury affirmatively answered the statutory punishment issues submitted pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071. 2 Appellant was sentenced to death. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071(e). Appeal to this Court is automatic. Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071(h). We will reverse.

I

THE ACCOMPLICE WITNESS RULE

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to corroborate the testimony of the State’s accomplice witnesses under Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 38.14. Art. 38.14…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API