Legal Opinion

People v. Grant

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1969No. Crim. 7536PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Charles Grant and Willie Pearl Grant were convicted after a court trial of possession of a narcotic (count one—Health & Saf. Code, § 11500); possession of a narcotic for sale (count two—Health & Saf. Code, § 11500.5); and transportation of a narcotic (count three— Health & Saf. Code, § 11501). They appeal from their respective judgments and sentences.

The evidence upon which the convictions were based was obtained by virtue of a search warrant directing a search of their persons and residence for narcotics and narcotic paraphernalia. Except for the argument that nighttime…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. ShipsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API