Legal Opinion

United States v. Rogers

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 24, 1986No. 53,237; CM 447023PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, appellant was found guilty by general court-martial before a military judge alone of possessing marihuana with intent to distribute, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. His approved sentence includes a bad-conduct discharge, reduction to the lowest enlisted pay grade, confinement for 1 year, and total forfeitures. Because the record of trial *436does not establish that appellant was informed of his appellate rights, he asks this Court to remand this ease for the purpose of having the military…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. KincheloeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. RogersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. KittsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. McIntoshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. MaharajhU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. CarverU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API