Legal Opinion

Kittle v. De Graaf

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 7, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the CourtCoke, J.

This is an equity action for infringement. The bill, mulatis mutandis, is in the usual form. The principal grounds of demurrer are— First, that equity lias no jurisdiction, for the reason that the action was commenced 21 days prior to the expiration of the patent, and the complainant has ample remedy at law; second, that it appears from the bill that the complainant has been guilty of laches in asserting his rights.

As the patent in question, and the conduct of the complainant, which is now the subject of criticism, were recently examined by this court in Kittle v. Hall, 29 Fed. Rep. 508, care…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Holley Bros. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1919
  2. Kittle v. FrostU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1871
  3. Lathrop v. Rice & Adams Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API