Johnson, Johnson, Stokes, Sandberg & Kragness, Ltd. v. Birnbaum
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
The law firm of Johnson, Johnson, Stokes, Sandberg & Kragness, Ltd. [Johnson Law Firm] appealed from a district court order vacating a default judgment for damages against Leonard Birnbaum. We hold the default judgment was not void and, consequently, the district court erred in vacating it under Rule 60(b)(iv), N.D.R.Civ.P. We reverse.
In 1986, attorney A.W. Stokes, an attorney in the Johnson Law Firm, performed legal services for Birnbaum. After Stokes left the firm, it sued Birnbaum for fees allegedly due for Stokes’s legal services. A default judgment was entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Lang v. Bank of SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Production Credit Ass'n of Minot v. DobrovolnyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roe v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- McKenzie County Social Service Board v. C.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Eggl v. Fleetguard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Dockter v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Estate of HeathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.