Legal Opinion

Payne v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 19, 1999No. Civ. H-93-1738PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GILMORE, District Judge.

I.Background

In this suit Plaintiff Jerry S. Payne (“Payne”) alleges that the United States is liable for unauthorized disclosures of his confidential tax return information made by Internal Revenue Agents (“IRS”) agents David W. Batista (“Batista”), Kenneth Frelow (“Frelow”), and Colin Levy (“Levy”) in violation of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. In particular, Payne claims that Batista, Frelow, and Levy “unnecessarily and indiscreetly contacted Payne’s clients, relatives and other attorneys with which Payne has done…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Elmer M. Kunkel, William H. Dennler, John D. Lockton, Ted B. Westfall and William D. Robertson v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Johnson v. Sawyer,et alCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Jackson v. WidnallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Williams Development & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API