Legal Opinion
United States v. Arambula
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided December 29, 2014No. 13-CR-3890-MV-2PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Erik Samuel Parra Arambu-la’s (“Parra”) Motion to Compel Specific Discovery [Doc. 64]. The Court, having considered the Motion, briefs, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is not well-taken and therefore will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On November 5, 2013, Task Force Officer (“TFO”) “Travis Chavez obtained a New Mexico Order” which permitted him “to acquire cellular GPS tracking data regarding” the T-Mobile cellphone number belonging to Parra. Doc. 64 at 1-2.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Arnold I. Mandel Rona K. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Albert JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. PopaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019