Legal Opinion

United States v. Popa

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 27, 2019No. Case No. 5:18-CR-448Published

1Opinion of the Court

Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge

There are four motions pending before the Court. Defendant moves for leave to file evidentiary motions instanter (ECF No. 22), to compel production of certain evidence (ECF No. 23), to suppress certain evidence (ECF No. 24), and to appoint Tami Loehrs as an expert for the defense (ECF No. 25). The first is granted; the latter three are denied.

I. Background

In April 2018, Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") Agent Ryan Anschutz was operating undercover on an Internet-based, peer-to-peer network known as "Freenet." ECF No. 23-1 at PageID#: 96.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. United States v. Arnold I. Mandel Rona K. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API