Legal Opinion
Bleser v. Thomas Haverty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1934No. Civ. 8468PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit.
Plaintiff was employed by Howe Bros., who, as an independent contractor, was installing plumbing fixtures in the Edison building in Los Angeles. Defendant Haverty, as a separate independent contractor, was installing sheet metal work in the same building. Defendants Miller and Galloway were employees of Haverty.
Between 9 and 10 A. M. on June 24, 1930, when the accident occurred from which this lawsuit arises, defendant employees had prepared a scaffold 12 feet high (which will hereafter be referred to as the Haverty scaffold) as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Gousse v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- John Spry Lumber Co. v. DugganIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Chamberlain v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Variety Manufacturing Co. v. LandakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jameson v. GavettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Dieckmann v. SignoriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Temple v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980