Legal Opinion
Daneault v. Clarke
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 28, 1973No. 6273PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant director from revoking his license to operate motor vehicles pending an administrative hearing to determine whether he refused to consent to a blood test under RSA 262-A:69-a (the implied consent law). The case reaches us upon an agreed statement of facts which discloses that the plaintiff was arrested and charged with driving a motor vehicle at Derry on February 19, 1971, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The parties disagree as to whether the arresting officer informed the plaintiff of the implied consent law (RSA 262-A:69-e as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BowlesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Gargagliano v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.