Henderson v. Hoesley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelsoN, J.
So many of the facts alleged in the complaint and answer as are necessary to an understanding of this con-' troversy will first be summarized. The complaint alleges -in substance that on or about the 21st day of February, 1933, proceedings were instituted by the city of Shullsburg for the acquisition by it of that part of the electric plant and. equipment owned by Interstate light & Power Company, located within the city, for the purpose of operating it as a public utility; that such proceedings were thereafter allowed to lapse *598and nothing further wa's done until in the month of August, 1935,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Janes v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Town of Milton v. McGowan Water, Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Otey v. Common Council of City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
- Garrett v. Tubac-Amado School District No. 5 of Santa Cruz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. HorebWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. HorebCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Superior Water, Light & Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.