Legal Opinion

Roberts v. McGur

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Delta. (Steere, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin, C. J.. The plaintiff brought replevin for a span of horses, harness, whiffletrees, and neck-yoke.

Defendant claims title to the property by virtue of an execution sale made about July 30, 1889, in the suit of Adams v. Johnson. Plaintiff claimed them by virtue of a iona fide sale from Johnson to him about July 15, 1889.

There is no conflict in the facts, which are substantially as follows: One Robert Adams sold to Archie Johnson one span of horses, one pair of bob-sleighs, one set of *223double harness, one set of whiffletrees, and one neck-yoke, and took Johnson’s note, with John Sexton…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lillibridge v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API