Legal Opinion

Blair v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kay County; before J. L. Pancoast, Trial Judge..

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error, Blair was convicted in the district court of Kay. county of the crime of grand larceny and sentenced to two and one-half years’ confinement in the penitentiary. He appeals from that judg ment, and presents but two alleged errors in his brief. It is first claimed that the evidence does not sustain the verdict of the jury. The prisoner was charged with the larceny of a set of double harness of the value of thirty-five dollars. The evidence clearly shows that the harness were property of one Tom Murray, and that they were stolen from…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Slater v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Coulter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Varner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Chrisman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Askew v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API