In re the Estate of Stephens
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John M. Keane, S.
It is not likely that the cunning conveyancer in the 15th century or earlier, who first conceived the idea of a “ feoffment to such uses as the feoffor should appoint by will”, envisioned some of the collateral offspring of the concept which we characterize today as a power of appointment. At its inception, the dominant purpose was to circumvent restrictive laws relating to real property. (See 5 American Law of Property — Part 23, pp. 459-479.)
Interestingly enough, its most publicized use today retains the basic concept of circumvention — only this time the villain is most…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of WildNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re the Accounting of Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- In re the Estate of FarollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Accounting of DreyfusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of EdwardsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of BurnhamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Estate of SnelhamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972