Legal Opinion

Ponte v. Lattin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1961No. 61-220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is under § 59.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., from an order granting a new trial after a verdict in an automobile accident case. Appellant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to indicate in the order granting new trial the ground on which the motion for it was granted, as required by § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A. Because the order granting new trial failed to state the ground or grounds on which it was granted, it is hereby reversed (Gaskill v. Montague, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 420; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Means v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Ebersole v. TeppermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Gaskill v. MontagueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morton v. StaplesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Hutchins v. City of HialeahDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mary Boutique, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API