Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. City of Hialeah

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1963No. 62-774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We are confronted again with an appeal from an order granting a new trial which failed to include a statement by the trial judge of any ground or grounds upon which such order was based, as required by statute and court rule (§ 59.07(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., rule 2.8(f) F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.). The absence of grounds in the order requires reversal. See Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240; Gaskill v. Montague, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 420; Ponte v. Lattin, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Means v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Ebersole v. TeppermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Gaskill v. MontagueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  2. City of Hialeah v. HutchinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. City of Hialeah v. HutchinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API