Legal Opinion

Levingston v. Retirement Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1995No. B090496PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

The Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees’ Retirement System appeals a judgment in administrative mandamus that directs it to grant a disability retirement to Fairy Levingston. The trial court’s findings are final. The board does not have a second opportunity for another hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) We affirm.

Facts

On July 25, 1991, Fairy Levingston sought a disability retirement from Santa Barbara County Employees’ Retirement System, claiming a permanent disability due to progressive rheumatoid arthritis. (Gov. Code, § 31720.) A year later, she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alberda v. Board of Retirement of Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Usher v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Kifle-Thompson v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Ocheltree v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Lynch v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API