Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Intermed, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1980No. CA 80-170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant at the end of the appellant’s presentation of evidence. The appellants ask that the directed verdict be reversed because either there was sufficient direct evidence of negligence, or res ipsa loquitur applied and the appellee should have been required to go forward with evidence it was not negligent. We hold that the appellants’ evidence was insufficient to establish their case or make res ipsa loquitur applicable, and thus we affirm.

The appellants presented a number of witnesses who were friends of their family…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stogsdill v. Manor Convalescent Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Brown v. University Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. Dollins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. McDonald v. Foster Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galvan v. Cameron Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Ward v. Forrester Day Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ward v. Forrester Day Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API