Legal Opinion

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 8, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01544Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544-WBS-KJN 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS 15 EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON CROSSEN; CORINNE FUEREST; ANDREW 16 ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON; JASON PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER 17 BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 22 Plaintiff Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. (“Zoom”) brings 23 this action against defendants Edward Roe, Maxwell Ramsay, Jon 24 Crossen, Corinne Fuerest,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Seven Arts Filmed Entertainmen v. Content Media Corporation PlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Alta Devices, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API