Legal Opinion
Mischalski v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1996No. 94 CV 3553 (RML)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEVY, United States Magistrate Judge:
Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Ford Motor Company (“defendant” or “Ford”) moves for leave to amend its answer to add a twelfth affirmative defense and for an order in limine permitting it to introduce evidence at trial of plaintiff Robert MischalsM’s “alien status” and related “illegal conduct.” For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied in part and granted in part.
The proposed amended answer is attached as Exhibit A to Ford’s motion papers; the purported new affirmative defense is as follows:
Upon information and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Barker v. KallashNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Dennis Leonardi and Steven Jay BerlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- TXI Transportation Co. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Chamblee v. Harris & Harris, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Leaf v. BeihofferColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Domingos Ayala v. LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.