Legal Opinion
In re Bentine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions
Application of William Bentine for a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Petitioner was convicted of having carnally known and abused a female of the age of sixteen years in violation of sec. 48, ch. 422, Laws 1921, which was as follows :
“Any person over eighteen years of age who shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any female under the age of eighteen years shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison not more than thirty-five years nor less than one year, or by fine not exceeding two hundred dollars; and any person of the age of eighteen years or under who *581shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any female under the age of eighteen years…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wight v. RindshopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Loose v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Mellen Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. WentlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Rock v. EkernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by23 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. HooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Kittler v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.