Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 26, 1989No. 09-88-029 CVPublished

1DissentBurgess, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority, at the onset, states this is a summary judgment appeal, but does not, in my opinion, apply summary judgment analysis. For example, the summary judgment was not granted on the basis of either the release or the assignment, yet the majority states the trial court should have granted it on those bases. This final pronouncement simply highlights the majority’s flawed analysis.

The sole point of error urged by appellant is the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment based upon the statute of limitation because Texas would recognize that there exist…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Neagle v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API