Legal Opinion
Jasaray Wilson v. Target Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 6, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00043Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JASARAY WILSON, Case No. 25-cv-00043-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 TARGET CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Jasaray Wilson alleges that Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”), her former 14 employer, discriminated against her, harassed her, and retaliated against her based on her gender 15 and sex, and she contends Target wrongfully terminated her employment. Before the Court is 16 Target’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The matter is fully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.