Smith & Co. v. Columbia Jewelry Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Seabrook. Dodge superior court. May 30, 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
1. A petition in the name of the “ Columbia Jewelry Company ” as plaintiff is amendable so as to show that the company is a partnership composed of individuals.
2. Even if an order for merchandise, procured by fraudulent representations made by an agent of the seller, authorized only to take and receive orders, is open, to cancellation on account of such fraud, the countermand must be delivered to the seller and not the agent.
3. Sending a countermand to such agent, with no attempt to communicate the same directly to the principal, is not sufficient to effect a rescission of the order.
4. Under…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. Borchardt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Parker v. KilgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Dublin & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Akerman & AkermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.