Legal Opinion

Aukam v. Zantzinger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (Merrick, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

In Aukam v. Zantsinger, 94 Md. 421, we determined that the present appellant was entitled to be heard on the exceptions to a re-sale of the property involved filed by him, and an order refusing to vacate one ratifying the sale, after he had tendered his exceptions was reversed. After the cause was remanded, a large amount of testimony was taken and the Court below ratified the sale on the first day of December, 1902. A petition for a rehearing was refused on the 20th of the following month, and an appeal was then prayed from the order of ratification, as well as from the one overruling and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopper v. HopperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  2. Zimmer v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  3. Aukam v. ZantzingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Keifer's Heirs v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Trust Co. v. Baltimore Refrigerating & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. Cockey v. HampsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API