Legal Opinion

Rhodes Burford Furniture Co. v. Mattox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1893No. 16,813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant sued the appellee to enjoin a judgment alleged to have been recovered by appellee against appellant before a justice of the peace.

An emergency was alleged in the complaint, making it proper for the judge to, and he did, grant an emer*373gency restraining order until a notice could be given appellee and a hearing had for a temporary injunction.

The court in term, after hearing evidence in support of the prayer for such temporary injunction, overruled appellants’ motion to continue said restraining order, and dissolved the same, to all of which appellant excepted, has appealed to this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Houk v. BartholdIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Miller v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Mullikin v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FreezeIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Todd v. CrailIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Rhodes-Burford Furniture Co. v. MattoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Fletcher v. BartonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Martin v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API