Legal Opinion

Grisbord v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1942No. Appeal, No. 40PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiffs are barbers, and in this action in equity sought to enjoin the city from enforcing the provisions of its ordinance of June 27, 1935 as amended, regulating the conduct of barber shops in Philadelphia and imposing the payment of an annual inspection fee of five dollars on each shop. The ordinance is intended to supplement the Act of June 19, 1931, P. L. 589 as *93amended, 63 PS 551, “An Act to promote the public health and safety......” Plaintiffs contend that the ordinance as a whole, and particularly in requiring the payment of an inspection fee, is an invalid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. RinalducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Kellerman v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Rothermel v. Meyerle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1890
  4. Commonwealth v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Girard Trust Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Genkinger v. New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Putney v. Abington TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Bussone v. BlatchfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API