Legal Opinion

Gleghorn v. City of Wichita Falls

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1976No. B-5844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

Our Per Curiam opinion of July 7,1976, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

This is a condemnation suit. The City of Wichita Falls and the Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2, Con-demnors, sought to enlarge an existing flowage easement over a portion of Wilmer Gleghorn’s land above the Lake Kemp reservoir and dam. In the trial court, Gleg-horn recovered a judgment for $200,000, and the Condemnors appealed.

The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded on two grounds. 531 S.W.2d 879. We agree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Pearland v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Wichita Falls v. GleghornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Blackbird, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  2. OTTO VEHLE & RESERVE LAW OFFICERS ASSN. v. BrennerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Lake LBJ Municipal Utility District v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API