Legal Opinion

Clorid v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2004No. CR 03-597PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

Appellant Gary Cloird stpetition ice. coram nobis in the Jefferson County Circuit Court, asserting the State had withheld exculpatory DNA test results from his defense attorney in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The circuit court found the test results were not favorable to the defense, and denied Mr. Cloird’s petition. On appeal, Mr. Cloird argues the circuit court erred in its findings and in its denial of his petition. We affirm.

Gary Cloird, Roosevelt Burton, and Kurt Morris were tried in August 1992 for the kidnapping and rape of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Penn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. ADRIAN LOUIS CARNER v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Martinez-Marmol v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. McCullough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Ventress v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API