Legal Opinion
Sylfa v. Stupnick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Florence Stupnick, Irwin Feinstein, and Gilda Goldstein appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 4, 1996, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendants Florence Stupnick, Irwin Feinstein, and Gilda Goldstein, and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stark v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Chrisostomides v. Berjas Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Caiazzo v. AngeloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Iannarone v. FaucettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hernandez v. Seven Fried FoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Javier v. LudinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Zimmerman v. Optica Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Burns v. GazdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Estate of WasisangSuperior Court of Guam · 2021