Legal Opinion
Peabody Coal Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1983No. 82-7422PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Peabody Coal Co. (“Peabody”) petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) granting the General Counsel’s motion for summary judgment. The NLRB cross-petitions for enforcement. Peabody argues that its refusal to bargain with the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) did not violate 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5) and (1) because the UMWA was contractually barred from representing the employees in question. It also argues that the NLRB erred in rejecting its request for review of the Regional Director’s supplemental decision of November 12, 1981…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. C. K. Smith & Co., Inc., and Buckley Heating Co., Inc., (Gasoline Division)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Mold v. IofredoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Wheat State Telephone Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Peabody Coal Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local 11, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 11Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Peabody Coal Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984