Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Bradshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.

The action is brought to recover damages which plaintiff claims she suffered by reason of a collision between the car in which she was riding and the car driven by the defendant Rodney Bradshaw. Plaintiff was riding in a car belonging to and driven by Leslie Wafer. This car was going easterly on Port Watson street in the city of Cortland. The Bradshaw car was traveling westerly on the same street. As the cars approached an intersecting street, the Bradshaw car turned to the left and southerly to enter the intercepting street, thus crossing the line of east-going traffic on Port Watson street.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Gittleman v. . FeltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Gittleman v. FeltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Lepel High Frequency Laboratories, Inc. v. CapitaNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hughes v. Charles Schweinler PressCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API