Legal Opinion

University City v. Diveley Auto Body Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1967No. 52069, 52070Published

1Opinion of the Court

417 S.W.2d 107 (1967)

UNIVERSITY CITY, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DIVELEY AUTO BODY COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 52069, 52070.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

June 12, 1967.

John J. Morris, City Counselor and John F. Mulligan, Associate City Counselor, University City, for respondent-plaintiff.

Milton Suffian and Joseph S. Rosenthal, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

BARRETT, Commissioner.

In separate informations and appeals, consolidated for trial and here, the Diveley Auto Body Company, Inc., was charged with unlawfully maintaining nonconforming signs in violation of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Domijan v. HarpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Veal v. LeimkuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Bartholomew v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API