Cheek v. W. H. Nicholson Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtMcMEANS, J.
The statement of the nature and result of the suit made by appellant in his brief, and assented to by appel-lees as being correct, is adopted in substance.
This is an action ex contractu, brought by J. R. Cheek, plaintiff, to recover from WH. Nicholson & Co. defendants, one rotary-, drilling rig and certain land, the said drilling rig and land being, by the uncontradicted evidence, of the total value of $3,000, the said rotary drilling rig and land having been promised to plaintiff, Cheek, by defendants as a commission for selling certain land and oil well property for defendants W. H.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reiter-Connolly Mfg. Co. v. HamlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Sittig v. BirkestackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Eldridge v. HawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Cheek v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ZappIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Southern Underwriters v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- James A. Dick Co. v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Drake v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Gotoskey v. GrawunderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913