Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Rice

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1991No. 18346PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a personal injury case. The predominant issue presented is whether the trial court adequately stated the grounds for the denial of a motion for new trial brought pursuant to I.R.C.P. 59(a)(5). We hold that in denying the motion for new trial the trial court did not adequately state the grounds for the denial of the motion because the trial court did not refer to I.R.C.P. 59(a)(5) or the standard applicable to the consideration of a motion under this rule and did not weigh the evidence to determine what amount the trial court would have awarded the injured party and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sanchez v. GaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wheatfall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lubcke v. Boise City/Ada County Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. WisselIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Foster v. City of St. AnthonyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API