Legal Opinion

State v. McKone

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of Burleigh County; Nuessle, «T. From a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of unlawfully importing intoxicating liquors for sale as a beverage, he appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe District Court of Burleigh County; Nuessle, «T. From a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of unlawfully importing intoxicating liquors for sale as a beverage, he appeals. The general rule in respect to the proof of private documents and writings is that before they are admissible in evidence their execution must be proved. 2 Jones, Ev. ¶ 538; Linn v. Boss, 16 N. J. L. 55; Francis' v. Hazierig, 1 A. K. Marsh. 93; Dunlap v. Glidden, 31 Me. 510; Williams v. Keyser, 11 Fla. 231, 89 Am. Dec. 213; Stamper v. Griffin, 20 Ga. 312, 65 Am. Dec. 628; Equitable Endowment Asso. v.…

1Opinion of the CourtFisk, C. J.

The appellant was convicted in the district court of Burleigh county of the crime of importing intoxicating liquors for sale as a beverage contrary to the provisions of § 9763 of the Bevised Codes of 1905, Comp. Laws 1913, § 10600. From a judgment of conviction he has appealed, urging fifty-five specifications of error upon which he relies for a reversal.

Most of these specifications relate to rulings on defendant’s objections to the admission of testimony and the refusals of the court to strike out answers to questions asked by the prosecution. A few relate to rulings admitting documentary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KilmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. TolleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. State v. GordonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. McCrillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API