Legal Opinion
Contech Engineered Solutions LLC v. Element Materials Technology St. Paul Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 29, 2015No. Civil No. 14-119 ADM/TNLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
On August 4, 2015, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant Element’ Materials Technology St. Paul Inc.’s (“Element”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 38]. Plaintiff Contech Engineered Solutions LLC (“Contech”) opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Inspection of the Holland Bridge
Contech manufactures, markets, and sells site solutions for construction projects. Joyce Decl. [Docket No.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Paul J. Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MCI Communications Services, Inc. v. Carl Bolander & Sons LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019