Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Trimble v. Kantas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1935No. 4-3956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Appellants ’ statement of this case may be adopted by us as being concise and yet sufficiently full to show the issues involved.

“This appeal involves the validity of special acts of the General Assembly prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within three miles of the University of. Arkansas, as provided in Special Acts of 1875, 1905 and 1907. In other words, are those acts repealed by acts 69, 108 and 109 of 1935?
“It was the contention of the plaintiffs that the acts of 1875,1905 and 1907 have not been repealed or amended, notwithstanding acts 69, 108 and 109 of 1935, called the Clerget…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coats v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Louisiana Oil Refining Company v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Hazelrigg v. Board of Penitentiary CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Massey v. State Use Prairie County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kersh Lake Drainage Dist. of Jefferson, Lincoln, & Desha Counties v. State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Kelleher v. Burlingame, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API