Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Meriden

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 23, 1965No. File No. CV 7-653-6187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

This action was brought in the small claims division of the Circuit Court and transferred to the regular civil docket, where the plaintiff filed an amended complaint setting forth the cause of action in detail. The allegations state that the plaintiff was operating his motor vehicle on Warren Street in the city of Meriden when a tree limb fell on his ear, causing damage; that Warren Street is maintained by the defendant city; that the charter empowers the city to regulate the use of sidewalks and to regulate the planting or removal of trees; that the office of the tree warden was established…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  2. Hourigan v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Jones v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  4. Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Dyer v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roman v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API