United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Luttrell

Russell, Judge.

The levy in the original attachment case was on a stock of goods and on an adding machine. Whether or not the adding machine was in fact owned by the defendant in attachment is a disputed issue of fact, but there may be a *327recovery on a statutory bond if any of the property wrong ally seized belongs to the defendant in attachment, although some of it does not. Hinton-Bellah, Inc. v. Thebit, 62 Ga. App. 672 (9 SE2d 779). While the question of ownership undoubtedly goes to the issue of damages, it does not go to the issue of whether or not there is any liability if it relates to…