Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bruno
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 25, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
5. Samuel Di Falco, S.
The administrator d. h. n. seeks permission to compromise causes of action, the removal of restrictions on his letters, fixation of the compensation of his attorney, and the judicial settlement of his account. Objections to the account and to the requested relief have been filed by the Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York and by Roosevelt Hospital.
The reasonable compensation of the attorney for the administrator is fixed and allowed in the sum of $2,525. The first objection of the hospital is overruled.
The court finds that the total amount of the proposed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldwater v. FischAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Matter of Kocko v. Harris Coal Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Roosevelt Hospital v. LoewyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
- In re the Estate of LuxtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964