Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Santa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 27, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 29, 1996, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Claimant was discharged from her position with the Eastman Kodak Company when she failed to report for work without giving 24 hours’ notice. The employer required such advance notice from all employees who, like claimant, had been placed on final warning status due to previous unexcused absences. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that while claimant had been fired for cause, she had not been proven guilty of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of WarnockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of MayrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of McDuffieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of McDuffieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of WaiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SiposAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.