Action Electric Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
This case seems to have two of everything except briefs. A brief has been filed by the employer, Action Electric, but this Court has not been favored with a brief from the Industrial Commission. The employer seeks to set aside a Commission order holding it liable for an employee’s compensation claim of $1,953.49, plus a statutory penalty of $293.02. At issue is the effect of two different sets of statutes that have been confused and intertwined in a tangle this Court must attempt to unsnarl. All statutory references are to Title 34, Utah Code Annotated, 1953.
Chapter 28, enacted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fata v. S. A. Healy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Callaway v. N. B. Downing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Zoll & Branch, P.C. v. AsayUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Hull v. ConvergeOne, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Lindsey Evans v. GlyMed Plus LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Olmstead v. Cottonwood Creek AgencyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025