Legal Opinion

Action Electric Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1981No. 16731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This case seems to have two of everything except briefs. A brief has been filed by the employer, Action Electric, but this Court has not been favored with a brief from the Industrial Commission. The employer seeks to set aside a Commission order holding it liable for an employee’s compensation claim of $1,953.49, plus a statutory penalty of $293.02. At issue is the effect of two different sets of statutes that have been confused and intertwined in a tangle this Court must attempt to unsnarl. All statutory references are to Title 34, Utah Code Annotated, 1953.

Chapter 28, enacted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Fata v. S. A. Healy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Callaway v. N. B. Downing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Zoll & Branch, P.C. v. AsayUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hull v. ConvergeOne, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  4. Lindsey Evans v. GlyMed Plus LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
  5. Olmstead v. Cottonwood Creek AgencyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API