Cleveland's Appeal From Probate
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal from the refusal of the Court of Probate for the district of Winchester to remove the appellant’s conservator, taken to the Superior Court of Litchfield County and tried to the court, Roraback, J.; facts found and judgment rendered affirming the action of the Court of Probate, and appeal by the appellant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.
In November, 1898, the Court of Probate for the district of Winchester, after due notice and hearing, duly appointed a conservator over the person and estate of Mr. Cleveland,—who by his next friend and attorney is the appellant in this case,—and no appeal was taken from such decree, which remains in full force and effect. The conservator so appointed accepted the appointment and duly qualified. Thereafter, in December, 1898, Mr. Cleveland, by his next friend and attorney, made application to said Court of Probate to be freed from the power of a .conservator and to have his estate restored to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cottrell v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Caron v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Wentz's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Beach v. First National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. TarchaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.