Legal Opinion

Salomon v. McRae

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

McRae, the defendant in error, sued Salomon on.a eon-tract of employment, under which he was entitled to receive a stipulated wage, and averred performance. On the termination of the contract, Salomon refused to pay him some $292.64, for which he brought this suit. The contract and its terms were admitted. By way of defense and counterclaim, the defendant set up representations alleged to have been made by McRae respecting the extent of his' acquaint*24anee and the trade which he could control, and the making of an agreement between the parties whereby McRae agreed that if he was permitted to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Wright v. . WeeksNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Dunphy v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Hall v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Newark Fire Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Carlson v. BorylaColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Anderson v. DaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. School District No. 46 v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Anderson v. DaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API