Conway, M., et ux v. The Cutler Group, Inc., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice McCAFFERY.
The issue presented in this case is whether a builder’s implied warranty of habitability, which protects those who purchase a newly constructed home from latent defects, may also be invoked by subsequent purchasers of the home. We hold that a subsequent purchaser of a previously inhabited residence may not recover contract damages for breach of the builder’s implied warranty of habitability.
In September 2003, The Cutler Group, Inc. (“Appellant”) sold a new house in Bucks County to Davey and Holly Fields. After living in the house for three years, Mr. and *663Mrs. Fields…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Peled v. Meridian BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fattah v. BimIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Barker, R. v. Dahlkemper LandscapeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Beaumont Condominium Assoc. v. Brown, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.