Legal Opinion

Conway, M., et ux v. The Cutler Group, Inc., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2014No. 80 MAP 2013PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

The issue presented in this case is whether a builder’s implied warranty of habitability, which protects those who purchase a newly constructed home from latent defects, may also be invoked by subsequent purchasers of the home. We hold that a subsequent purchaser of a previously inhabited residence may not recover contract damages for breach of the builder’s implied warranty of habitability.

In September 2003, The Cutler Group, Inc. (“Appellant”) sold a new house in Bucks County to Davey and Holly Fields. After living in the house for three years, Mr. and *663Mrs. Fields…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Peled v. Meridian BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Fattah v. BimIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Barker, R. v. Dahlkemper LandscapeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Beaumont Condominium Assoc. v. Brown, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API