Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Stacey, Ca2008-06-019 (12-22-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2008No. CA2008-06-019PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Cincinnati Insurance Company ("CIC") and Sewell Motor Express, appeal a declaratory judgment from the Clinton County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Jay Stacey and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London ("Lloyd's").

I. FACTS

{¶ 2} Appellant Sewell is an authorized motor carrier incorporated under Ohio law, engaged in the business of transporting property for hire via owned and leased commercial vehicles. About 40 percent of Sewell's drivers are independent contractors who lease their equipment to Sewell.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. v. FarranDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. Alexander v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API